Page 6 of 7

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:22 am
by Grimey
Yep,
Nothing to add.

"RDA fix",
what a wonderful expression!
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 8:27 am
by Anne
Grimey wrote:Yep,
Nothing to add.

"RDA fix",
what a wonderful expression!
:lol: :lol: :lol:
:D :D :D :D

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:01 am
by Caty
PamK1950 wrote:I don't know, but considering all of the information that members have posted from other sources on here, what is wrong with sharing the updates RDA sends Kate with other fans (as long as it is credited properly)? He doesn't belong to us exclusively and IMO if he didn't want something shared on the web, Kate wouldn't post it.

Just my thoughts.
The only problem is if they are not "crediting properly"!
I know a Facebookpage, where the operator post the updates as if they were directly to her.
She didn't get it, when I accused her of hurting copyrights. Some people are too dense :x

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:17 am
by Annelies
GREAT JOB Caty, way to go to tell her!! I think that's where we come in with our family of wild loyalists ;). Like Kate said: feel free to redirect people on that site to rdanderson.com..
We can have huge discussions about it, what to do, is it right or wrong, but if we act (ofcourse in a friendly but straight way ;) ) it will have the good effect (if not immediate it will in time) I think.
Caty did you post it open on the Facebook site? Or did you send a pm?, just curious..
I think that person heard you, but didn't want to act (yet), I mean it's a big public letdown when people believe the message and it turns out otherwise.... And truth will come up deffinetly, just like karma always does ;)

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:27 am
by Caty
Annelies wrote: Caty did you post it open on the Facebook site? Or did you send a pm?, just curious..
I think that person heard you, but didn't want to act (yet), I mean it's a big public letdown when people believe the message and it turns out otherwise.... And truth will come up deffinetly, just like karma always does ;)
First I told her via PM to rename the group, the title suggested her news came directly from RDA.
I tried it the friendly way, told her to avoid any legal measures ...
She changed it the next day.

But when there appeared more news and pictures she reclaimed as her own, I wrote openly that they come from here.
I think, the group doesn't exist anymore. 1 : 0 for me :lol: :lol:

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:38 am
by Annelies
Caty wrote:
Annelies wrote: Caty did you post it open on the Facebook site? Or did you send a pm?, just curious..
I think that person heard you, but didn't want to act (yet), I mean it's a big public letdown when people believe the message and it turns out otherwise.... And truth will come up deffinetly, just like karma always does ;)
First I told her via PM to rename the group, the title suggested her news came directly from RDA.
I tried it the friendly way, told her to avoid any legal measures ...
She changed it the next day.

But when there appeared more news and pictures she reclaimed as her own, I wrote openly that they come from here.
I think, the group doesn't exist anymore. 1 : 0 for me :lol: :lol:
Ladies and Gentlemen WE HAVE A WINNER
Great Caty!!!

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:46 am
by Lis
Okay, simply something upload in his name is Shit.
But what about when you mention the page.
I have my side on Facebook completely privatized Tonight.
Starting today, I'll post only collages and photos on Kate's side.
It was of me not meant evil as I've uploaded things from Kate on Facebook.
As I said, it is so synonymous because it comes from Kate's side.
I hope that Kate the Side not closes. It is a so beautiful side.
Lis

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 2:35 pm
by tvero80
I think we all agree.
Image

And the persons we love.If we can help protect RDA and Kate's website, whatever the means,let's do it.

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 10:57 pm
by frenchwriter
Caty wrote:
First I told her via PM to rename the group, the title suggested her news came directly from RDA.
I tried it the friendly way, told her to avoid any legal measures ...
She changed it the next day.

But when there appeared more news and pictures she reclaimed as her own, I wrote openly that they come from here.
I think, the group doesn't exist anymore. 1 : 0 for me :lol: :lol:
Me too, on FB, I seen a person who called her page : RDA (with subtitle : actor, director ) with pictures... Perhaps she was the same person you are telling. And I wrote a message on her wall... (with two other people) to explain that was forbidden to doing that. If she known very well Richard, if she loved him, she would never have done this!

So, we all agree here to respect the privacy to Richard and his kindness for us : As "wild loyalists" we are, let us pledge to not share selfies Richard offers us on this site. And don't forget to quote (and to give the link) http://rdanderson.com if we share images or content of this website that Kate has built for over twenty years.

Thank to all messages and all thoughts...

Re: OUR BETTER SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2016 11:06 pm
by Annelies
Image
I'm here for Kate and Richard,and for all the people around here..